Designing AeT’s First Student and Educator Dashboards

Pearson

Turning raw performance data into clear, actionable insights across web and native.

Role: Senior Product Designer

Timeline: 2025

Platform: Web + Native

Collaborators: PMs, Engineers, Research, Design Systems Team

Context

Before this work, Pearson’s AeT platform had no centralized dashboard experience for students or educators. Students lacked clear daily priorities, while educators had limited visibility into engagement, assignment progress, and learning trends.

I led the design of Pearson’s first student and educator dashboards from zero to one, defining the IA, insight hierarchy, core workflows, and scalable design system patterns across web and native.

Problem
Educators needed:
  • A quick view of class health

  • Early identification of at-risk students

  • Trends across topics and assignments

  • Clear drill-downs for deeper insight

Students needed:
  • A single place to understand what’s due

  • Clear prioritization (today, overdue, upcoming)

  • Consistent guidance across web and native

  • Support when falling behind

AeT had the data but lacked a unified experience to surface insights in a way that supported real teaching and learning workflows.

Research Insights

Partnering with research, I conducted interviews with 13 educators and additional student sessions to understand their mental models, workflows, and priorities.

Educator Insights (MoSCoW Prioritization)

Must-Have for MVP:

1. Assignment-Level Histograms

Need score distribution, not averages.

“I want a histogram of completion, not just the average.”

2. Student & Topic Drill-Downs

Compare students, assignments, and topics.

“I want to compare students across assignments and topics.”

3. Behavior-Change Detection

Early visibility into drops in engagement or performance.

“I want to see changes in student behavior.”

Should-Have:

1. Topic-level performance patterns

2. Class-section comparisons

Could-Have:

1. National benchmarks

Won’t-Have:

1. Raw time-on-platform metrics (too misleading)

Need score distribution, not averages.

“They’ll just log in for 3 minutes to look active.”

Student Priorities

1. What’s due today

2. What’s overdue

3. What’s upcoming

4. Review

Workflow & Systems Mapping

Before designing the final dashboard experiences, I mapped educator and student workflows to better understand how assignments, remediation, LMS integrations, and intervention behaviors connected across the broader platform ecosystem.

This systems mapping helped identify dependencies, reduce workflow complexity, and align dashboard experiences around actionable decision-making.

Full Ecosystem Mapping
Educator Workflow

The educator experience focused on helping instructors quickly identify at-risk students, track assignment performance, and navigate intervention workflows more efficiently across the LMS and Pearson+ ecosystem.

The workflow mapping helped surface key decision points around performance visibility, assignment states, and student engagement behaviors.

Student Workflow

The student experience focused on reducing cognitive load by helping learners better navigate assignments, remediation paths, and progress tracking across multiple states and learning scenarios.

The workflow mapping clarified how students moved between dashboard experiences, assignments, and support resources while identifying opportunities to simplify navigation and prioritization.

Workflow Files

Explore the full workflow mapping and systems architecture in FigJam. [Open FigJam ↗]

Approach
1. Design for decisions, not data

Every insight was designed to answer,What should I do next

2. Unify the system across web + native

Shared layouts, spacing, and navigation patterns ensured consistent behavior across platforms

3. Reduce cognitive load

Prioritized essential information first, with drill-downs available for deeper analysis

Final Experience

Educator Dashboard (Instructor Insights for AeT)

These screens show how the Educator Dashboard supported data-driven teaching across class, assignment, and student levels.

Class Overview — Desktop & Mobile

Gives instructors a clear snapshot of class health, students needing support, and topic-level challenges. This helped educators identify issues early and prioritize where to intervene.

Assignment Drill-Down — Desktop & Mobile

A detailed breakdown of assignment performance, including score distributions, question-level trends, and completion rates. This enabled teachers to quickly understand where students were struggling.

Student Drill-Down — Desktop & Mobile

A focused view of an individual student’s engagement, performance, and risk indicators. Educators used this screen to offer personalized support and track progress over time.

Behavior-Change Alert — Desktop & Mobile

Automated alerts highlight meaningful shifts in engagement or performance. These notifications gave educators early visibility into drops in progress and allowed timely intervention.

This became the central hub for understanding class performance within AeT.

Student Dashboard (AeT)

Designed to reduce confusion and help students focus on what matters most.

What’s Next — Desktop & Mobile

A quick view of upcoming tasks and actions so students always know their next step.

Assignments — Desktop & Mobile

A structured breakdown of due, overdue, and completed work to help students stay organized.

Review Mode (Flashcard Press) — Desktop and Mobile

A dedicated space for reinforcing concepts, reviewing missed questions, and strengthening understanding.

Review Mode (Topic Press) — Desktop and Mobile

A dedicated space for practicing topic-level multiple-choice questions, reviewing missed answers, and strengthening understanding.

Students quickly understood priorities and next steps.

Design System Contributions (Web + Native)

Because AeT had no dashboards before this project, many required DS components didn’t exist.

These became foundational elements in the Pearson Design System and supported later theme work, including Sepia Mode

Insight Cards

A scalable pattern for surfacing key insights across web and native, providing a consistent summary layout for instructors and students.

Performance Charts

Unified histogram and trend components that standardize how performance data is visualized across AeT and reduce inconsistency across teams.

Alert & Prioritization Indicators

A clear system for highlighting at-risk students and urgent tasks using consistent color, hierarchy, and status tokens.

Outcomes

This work established AeT’s first scalable analytics foundation, improving visibility, decision making, and consistency across web and native for both students and educators

For Educators:

Enabled faster identification of at risk students to support earlier intervention

Improved visibility into assignment performance and topic trends

Established consistent, predictable drill-down patterns for deeper analysis

Introduced reusable components adopted across learning teams

For Students:

Created clear daily priorities that guide learning and next steps

Increased engagement with remediation and follow-up actions

Reduced friction across web and native experiences

For AeT + Design System:

Established new insight and chart components for analytics experiences

Strengthened cross-platform alignment across web and native

Built scalable patterns to support future dashboard and insight features

Enabled component reuse across multiple product teams

Next steps

The next phase would focus on testing whether earlier engagement signals, like reading drop off or missed assignments, should surface in the class overview before a student is already at risk. The bigger question was whether educators would act on predictive indicators early, or rely more on confirmation based data throughout the semester.